|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Kryptik Kai
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
19537
   |
Posted - 2016.03.18 15:21:24 -
[1] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Could the problem be else where and those no commitment attack just be a symptom? Is there any of those group actually interested in taking SOV? If they are not, what are the reasons? While attacking something just for the hell of it is totally a valid EVE gameplay, is it what this really is about? Villages not worth taking but we'll throw a flaming torch at the wall every night for the hell of it?
Something something "We're not here to ruin the game, we're here to ruin YOUR game"
Seriously tho, while wandsov isn't particularly inspired, its still better than the bs that came before it.
You (SMA) chose systems to claim. You chose the vulnerability windows. You're part of the largest coalition in the game. Get your shtako together.
"Shiny.-á Lets be bad guys." -Jayne Cobb
|
Kryptik Kai
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
19537
|
Posted - 2016.03.18 15:36:01 -
[2] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Kryptik Kai wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:Could the problem be else where and those no commitment attack just be a symptom? Is there any of those group actually interested in taking SOV? If they are not, what are the reasons? While attacking something just for the hell of it is totally a valid EVE gameplay, is it what this really is about? Villages not worth taking but we'll throw a flaming torch at the wall every night for the hell of it? Something something "We're not here to ruin the game, we're here to ruin YOUR game" Seriously tho, while wandsov isn't particularly inspired, its still better than the bs that came before it. You (SMA) chose systems to claim. You chose the vulnerability windows. You're part of the largest coalition in the game. Get your shtako together. Those comments coming from PH who didn't even defend 1 systems and moonwalked out BEFORE the announcement of our attack was made is pure gold. Can't you see the system at least have issue when your alliance decided to pack up and leave instead of even trying to defend it's systems? Why was reddit so proud of this? Was that move OP what you call "getting your shtako togethers"? I really want to know if you think that's how it's supposed to be done.
You're talking about the bastard children of a nomadic alliance... in less than a year we've moved several times. What gives you the impression sov for us is more than just a place to hang our hats?
Also, not sure why its "gold" as I don't recall us complaining about sov mechanics. If we had whined and were now making fun of SMA for whining then sure... but... nope.
"Shiny.-á Lets be bad guys." -Jayne Cobb
|
Kryptik Kai
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
19541
|
Posted - 2016.03.18 16:06:40 -
[3] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Of course you didn't complain since you didn't even try it. I think both side of the system are bad. Running to every boor bell in defense is stupid and being able to burn down an entire region in a week sound just as stupid to me. The entire thing right now has 2 way doing it. You completely overwhelm your opponent and burn his **** to the ground in one relatively quick way or you play ding dong ditch often enough to make their patience burn away. The system was supposed to prevent weaponized boredom but it's still a strategy people can employ.
It doesn't really matter what sov system is in place, 40k coalition vs 2k (at that time) newbro group was never going to be defended. Unless you wanted to us to hang around perma docked or just show newbros what its like to welp over and over again I'm not sure what you expected.
As for the current system, yes, there are several ways for it to be played. Not sure why thats supposed to be a bad thing.
"Shiny.-á Lets be bad guys." -Jayne Cobb
|
Kryptik Kai
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
19542
|
Posted - 2016.03.18 16:29:12 -
[4] - Quote
Terminal Insanity wrote:
You only think its better than what came before, because you hold no sov and have no intention of holding sov.
We don't have sov? 
Quote:You (horde) shouldnt be able to challenge sov
Because screw the sandbox
"Shiny.-á Lets be bad guys." -Jayne Cobb
|
Kryptik Kai
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
19543
|
Posted - 2016.03.18 16:37:30 -
[5] - Quote
Terminal Insanity wrote:Kryptik Kai wrote:Terminal Insanity wrote:
You only think its better than what came before, because you hold no sov and have no intention of holding sov.
We don't have sov? Quote:You (horde) shouldnt be able to challenge sov Because screw the sandbox well **** i'd like to get rid of concord. can we do that too?
Concord doesn't stop gankers, whats your point?
"Shiny.-á Lets be bad guys." -Jayne Cobb
|
Kryptik Kai
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
19560
|
Posted - 2016.03.18 23:31:54 -
[6] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:just a bunch of nobodies crying that they couldn't defeat their enemies
/thread
"Shiny.-á Lets be bad guys." -Jayne Cobb
|
Kryptik Kai
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
19598
|
Posted - 2016.03.19 14:30:31 -
[7] - Quote
Rain6637 wrote:CBBOMBERMAN wrote:Got to love this waterfall of tears from the CFC.
Please change the title of the thread from:
"Please reduce the number of SOV timers"
To
"CCP please help me survive the war vs the allies"
But isn't it nice when threads don't get flushed down the toilet every day?
Well at least you understand that this thread started in the toilet 
Honestly... largest coalition in the game by far complaining that they can't cover some timers... ffs
"Shiny.-á Lets be bad guys." -Jayne Cobb
|
Kryptik Kai
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
19618
|
Posted - 2016.03.20 12:46:27 -
[8] - Quote
Rain6637 wrote:
Ignore OP, they haven't accepted that you pick between a job or sov, and you don't get to have both.
Again implying that the largest coalition in the game can't find the players to cover timers 
"Shiny.-á Lets be bad guys." -Jayne Cobb
|
|
|
| |
|